Recent comments by Donald Trump about Emmanuel Macron's marriage have sparked a debate about whether politicians' personal lives should influence diplomatic relations. With the war with Iran as a backdrop, this raises questions about the relevance and appropriateness of personal remarks in political discourse and their impact on international alliances.
I believe a politicians personal lives shouldn't interfere with diplomatic relations and problems. To judge a nations diplomatic worth by its leaders behavior and personal lives is a huge mistake. This has appeared in history many times such as Roosevelt, Churchill, and Nixon, founding fathers of many governments and world order. They were deeply flawed people by their moral accounting. Applying their personal life biases opens the door to weaponized moralism, where nations have access to powerful weapons that can cause damage. Foreign policy must be durable and the moment that personal reputation becomes a diplomatic issue, every rumor can become a rupture in relations that took many years to build. Diplomacy is a tool of statecraft, not a morality tribunal, and conflating the two produces nothing but paralysis dressed up as principle.
Logic scores are hidden until resolution. Each side needs 3 strong arguments to max out its score. Your individual score determines your payout.